Decoder needs decoding
I was drawn to this story out of compassion. Though my story Hipple 2016 remains tied for last place with this and many others I can at least comfort myself in the belief no one read it and it would get votes from most who did unless some quirk forbids them from voting for many stories in the same contest.
This tale appears last among the zeroes and so gets the stigma of being the least popular story in the contest. No doubt it is far from the worst.
The style reminds me of Angela's ashes, using present tense verbs and it makes more sense that way because unlike Angela's ashes, a true story from the author's childhood, this looks like it's in progress, almost deliberately giving the essence of a stream of consciousness technique. That's the stories strongest point but I can't be sure it's intentional.
The weakness of the story is that it is not clearly fixed in time. Apparently the few people mentioned are humans in a future where most activities are as they are now. Roast beef, lasagna and love-making have not changed, nor have social norms. The only major difference is the decoders, authoritarian government and the reliance on pills. As usual-and the most acclaimed works in scifi suffer from this-there is no explanation on how these changes came about. While it would require many paragraphs to explain it would also humanize the persons in the story if the narrator could give some clue to what life was like immediately before the changes.
In this weakness it has too much company. Did anyone notice that the protagonist in 1984 was 39, therefore born in 1945, and Big Brother's achievements were "pushed back" to the 1950s, so he wouldn't need cryptic clues about how life used to be. He'd remember!
I kept waiting for a surprise ending, but there isn't one. If the man is about to kill himself, not just the character in his story a final sentence with a splash might make that clear.
What we have then is a hollow character in what should be a middle chapter about a man deciding to challenge the system. Standing alone the tale does little to provide emotion.
I'm also not a fan of flowery imagery to say it's 11:30, but occasionally-like the sex scene-a few intense words might have helped. A writer shouldn't show off his vocabulary or knowledge of diverse matters in every line, just often enough to prove he knows big words too.
No badges received yet